The Burmilla/Tiffanie Program
(return to index page)
Update 2001
Update 2007 CFA Application
The Burmilla is a breed within the Asian Group that originated in
the
United Kingdom some 15 years ago as the result of an accidental mating
between
a Chinchilla Persian male and a Platinum/Lilac Burmese female. The
resulting offspring were so impressive in type and vigour that it was
decided to proceed with a breeding program using this hybrid with
Burmese cats. The Chinchilla is only used once for the foundation
breeding of a new line. The Burmilla is recognised for
Championship by the GCCF and FIFE , having passed through experimental
and provisional statuses . South Africa, Australia, Holland
Switzerland and Denmark are some of the other countries where breeding
programs
are taking place. The Asian Group is the name used, in the above
programs,
for cats of Foreign Burmese type, with non-Foreign Burmese coat colour,
pattern
or length. "Asian" cats bear the same relationship to the Foreign
Burmese
as the "Orientals" do to the Siamese.
The breeds within the Asian Group are:
- Burmilla:- The shaded or tipped variety of the Asian cat.
- Asian Smoke:- The Smoke variety of the Asian cat (non-agouti).
- Asian Tabby:- The Ticked, Spotted, Mackerel or Classic Tabby
varieties of the Asian cat.
- Bombay:- The Self Black variey of the Asian cat.
- Tiffanie:- The Semi-long haired variety of the Asian.
Any of the above coat colour patterns can appear in long and short
haired cats. In the United Kingdom, and other parts of the world where
these cats are recognised, only the shaded, short haired cats are
referred to as Burmillas. All the other coat colour patterns in short
haired cats are referred to
as Asians and all colour patterns in the long hair are designated as
Tiffanies. For more detailed information on the British and European
Asian Group we
suggest that later you go to the home page of the Asian Cat Society in
England.
In December 1995, Strathkirk and Horizons imported two long haired
Burmillas, (Tiffanies), from England. They were Moonspinners Mercury
and Meerani, who were then shown Experimental Status in the Canadian
Cat Association. They were bred subsequently to a variety of Foreign
and Traditional Burmese. Some 80 of their offspring, (short haired Burmillas carrying the long haired gene),
followed. Twenty of these Burmillas were kept for
further breeding. We now breed Burmilla to Burmilla and have begun to
produce
Tiffanies in approximately 25% of the
breedings.
All Burmillas were granted New Breed Staus in November 1997. Our
Burmillas
began showing in the Spring of 1998 and gained Championship
Status
by 1999. A limited number of these kittens have been for
sale and are proving to be very popular.
In order to simplify acceptance of this breed in Canada and to
facilitate the subsequent registration and judging processes, these
cats are identified as Short or Long Haired Burmillas and are further
described by their pattern (ie. self, smoke, shaded, Tipped, Tabby,
etc). This simplification also
avoids confusion with hte commonly use discriptor "Asian" (ie the cat
is
of asian type)and the American breed of Chantily / Tiffany
already
recognised by some associations. Thus all Canadian cats from this breed
pool
are Burmilla(s), the term Asian is not used.
In December 1996, we imported a Chinchilla
Persian , Chico's Christian from England. He was selected for his
natural head shape and carriage of the golden gene. Christian was
subsequently bred to selected Foreign and Traditional Burmese Queens to
produce F1 Burmillas. This
was done to produce a completely different line of Burmillas, thus
increasing the gene pool. This part of the program takes about 3 years.
The process of producing a full
Burmilla (or Asian using the English terminology) from a foundation
breeding is complex, not for the faint hearted, and is as follows.
Step 1: Burmese x Chinchilla This gives 1st generation,
(F1), Burmillas. This results in Shaded or Tipped varieties or
occasionally Ticked Tabbies if the Chinchilla carries Golden.
Step 2: F1 Burmilla back again to Burmese This gives 2nd
generation, (F2), Burmillas. At this stage you can expect to get
Tabbies, Selfs and
Smokes as well as Shaded or Tipped varieties.
Step 3: F2 Burmilla to an unrelated Burmilla (any variety) This
gives 3rd generation, (F3), Burmillas. Again any variety is possible,
including longhaired Burmillas, (Tiffanies), if the F2 cats both carry
the longhair gene.
Step 4: F3 Burmilla should be mated back to Burmese This
gives
the 4th generation, (F4), or full Burmillas.
As a protocol, in our tracking nomonclature, we hold a cat at F3
status until it has gone back to a Burmese. We find that it is
sometimes
useful to repeat breedings F3 to F3 to hold a recessive ie long hair.
We
also note in the pedigrees that not many English Breeders have held to
this
complete program.
After F4 is accomplished, matings should mainly be Burmilla to Burmilla
but can at any time, go back to the Burmese, which is an allowable
out-cross
to the full Burmilla.
In simple terms the objective of the Burmilla breeding program is to
import the Long hair, Black colour, and Silver undercoat genetics, from
the Chinchilla Persian while keeping the sleek, no undercoat, fur and
the outgoing interactive personality of the Burmese.
The following pages show some of the breeding lines as they have
developed.
Update as of Feb 2001 (the
politics of it all)
In the fall of 2000 Phoenix based Theresa Meyers authored a
feature for Cat Fancy Magazine on the Asian cat.
We note the following quote:
"European Burmese are the key to the recognition of the Asians in
this country. European Burmese have provisional status with the
C.F.A. Once they reach championship status we have a ground work
for their child breed, the Asians, " says Kim Ghorbrial, owner of Bes
Cattery in Portland Ore., and one of the original breeders of Asians in
the United States. "The difficulty is in establishing the breed
with enough breeders who are following the guidelines established by
the G.C.C.F and the U.F.O. This
means the breed must be bred from European Burmese, not American
Burmese, which are a different breed with a different look. Many
breeders in Canada are using American Burmese, and it’s not the same
cat."
Ms. Naomi Johnson, Secretary of the Asian Group Cat Society, (a cat
club in England), is also quoted therein as saying "they (Asians) are
basically Burmese with different colors, patterns and coat
lengths…" Ms Johnson is also quoted in the Nov. 2000 issue of
Your Cat, an English publication, as saying a Tiffanie is "A cross
between Burmese and longhair Chinchillas".
Our comments follow:
Our views on "European" Vs "North American Burmese" (there is no such
thing as an American Burmese) are well stated on our Burmese page. As to our cats being
different, we refer you to the history of the English Burmese in the
book "The Burmese Cat". This book is a publication of the Burmese Cat
Club in England in 1994, edited by Robine Pocock published by Unwin
Brothers Ltd. for the Burmese Cat Club Benevolent Fund. The reader
should know in reviewing page 16 of that text that Halton Ridge, home
of
Halton Ridge Alfie, a British
founding
cat, is within less than a 1 hr. drive from Toronto. Halton Ridge Alfie
was
a Silkwood cat base in Missauga Ont, a suburb of Toronto.The Wai-ling
cats are is Shy boys pedigree
For those who don't have access to that book, the point I am making
here is that Canadian cats and specifically our cats forbearers were
used in the founding of European Burmese. In fact, a review of the
posted 12 generation pedigree of our European boy, Maple Leaf,
illustrates just how much Alphie is the European cat. Ms Ghorbrial does
not know her pedigrees.
The 4 generation breeding protocol described above on this page, is
a quote
from an e-mail sent to us by Ms. Johnson in the Winter of 1996.
The
documentation that she provided with it was the basis for the breeding
standards
and registration requirements accepted by the Canadian Cat Association.
Ms. Ghorbrial is a known C.F.A. European Burmese breeder. In her public
e-mails, she described an accidental breeding in 1998, between
her
European Burmese and an Abyssinian. We were surprised that she
received
support from Ms. Johnson, who suggested that the offspring be called
Asians.
Most countries who recognize cats from the Asian Group, like us, have
followed the G.C.C.F. standards and have begun their breeding programs
with English Asians. Apparently, unknown to us, and a number of
other breeders, both
in England and elsewhere, the G.C.C.F. Registration Policy had
been
significantly changed in 1996 and again in 2000.
Copies of the Registration Policies dating back to 1993, which we have
just received from G.C.C.F., are attached/linked.
It is our understanding that the 1996 breed policy change was
instituted in order to open the gene pool to accommodate some long ago
past breedings and a allow very few breeders who would bring in
specific genes such as
the "spotted tabby". We have experienced the spotted tabby, all things
come
in time, shortcuts create problems.
The new 1996/2000 breed policy document enables breeding of Asians to "anything"
and
is, in our opinion, a recipe for a "moggie" and a shortcut to a new
breed, that the UFO have jumped upon. The Burmese and Chinchilla
are no longer required. The current 4 generation protocol now
requires that the offspring of an Asian X "anything" (with a few minor
exceptions), must go back to an Asian OR (and we underline or) Burmese
3 times prior to being a full registered Asian. We certainly
question the ability of Ms. Ghorbrial and other U.F.O. breeders, to
breed a cat that is anything like our Burmillas or the international
Asian. If they follow the revised standard, as they
claim they will, they may now breed to "anything", thus providing the
public
with a very different cat . One wonders what Ms. Ghorbrial et. al.
would
think of an Asian to -- say a --- Maine Coon or Pixie Bob, next
door.;-)!!!
In 1981 the original Chinchilla / Burmese cross of Baroness Miranda
Von Kirchberg required "new breed " status by G.C.C.F. and took some 15
years to accomplish. How is it now, that an Asian to
"anything" (with a few minor exceptions), does not require the same?
We suspect that the G.C.C.F.’s Executive committee overlooked the
implications of what they were ratifying in 96/2000.
It is our intention to breed Burmillas (Asians) from the original
Burmese / Chinchilla ancestry. We will continue with the breeding
protocol
wherein the Chinchilla is used only once in the foundation of a line.
The
Canadian Cat Association breed standard is attached/linked. The allowable
outbreed
section is at the end of the document.
Ms. Ghorbrial’s comments re: "serious efforts are underway to have
the new breed recognized by the C.F.A." would seem highly
unlikely to
us! Most, very conservative North American breed associations,
particularly
the C.F.A., will take even longer to recognize the Asian with this new
2000
non-uniform "catch all" registration policy.
The waters have become very muddy for the Burmilla's future. For
instance, we note that it has taken the "Red" Burmese 25 years to be
accepted in North America. We still endure the "Barn Cat"
epitaph.
We think that the U.F.O. should call these cats, as lovely as they
may be, something other than "Asians"; however, we understand that new
breed
status is a long and difficult process.
We do not understand why Ms. Johnson, in her public statements,
continues to say that the Asian comes from a Burmese / Chinchilla
cross. Sadly, this is no longer the truth. We continue to
hope that the Asian Group Cat Society will rectify the situation.
end
Update July 2002
It is our understanding that FIFE and various European cat registries
have rejected the 1996/2000 Asian definition and continue to require
that the Burmilla/Tiffanie
gene pool be exclusivly Burmese and Chinchilla as was the original GCCF
policy.
Comment re Polycystic kidney disease (PKD) in Persians and Asians
of Persian ancestry. This raises 2 points.
1) Our original imported Tiffanies, Meerani, and Mercury, DOB Oct. 95
, both still live with us and have never been sick - of anything.
Christian , DOB April '96, our imported Chinchilla Persian, lives with
a close friend, also in a multi cat household, and is likewise. Vet.
texts suggest PKD in the inherited
form has a 3-10 year window, and is autosomal dominant (Feline
Husbandry
N.C. Pedersen). There are no reports in these cats lines, proir or
post,
that we are aware of. We don't have it.
2) The 'Burmilla,' which is the cat that most people are looking for,
looks like a Singapura (if one follows the GCCF definition). That is
genetically
(in laymans terms) a ticked, silver tipped cat, and is of Burmese
temperament. It is possibly also a super wideband cat, being tipped.
...Strathkirk Iolanthe is a good example.
Breeding an Abyssinian or Somali to a Burmese, (as does Ms Ghobrial and
the UFO group) can not genetically deliver that colour, coat, or
pattern.
Conventional genetics has it that wide band and silver can only come
from
the Chinchilla. Thus, any of the UFO group who deliver 'Burmillas' have
it
wrong, or have Persian ancestry, unless of course they got these
genetics
elsewhere, which would remove them further from the original gene pool.
end
Update May 2003
Ms Ghobrial contacted CCA and requested they register her
"Burmillas".
The breed policy and protocol was explained to her. Cats of other than
Burmese
/Persian ancestry do not qualify.
update - the following email (part)was received
From: "walters" <walters@idx.com.au>
Date: Sun, 2 Mar 2003 20:54:21 +1100
--
Our Australian Tiffanie differs in the breeding program quite markedly
to your's in that we allow going back to Chinchillas in later than
foundation generation ... and we also allow outcrossing to Silver
Longhair Exotic.
We only accept silvers - and so far we're producing lovely kittens ...
but not yet uniform type. We're up to Gen 3. ... my latest
two litters - both litters being sired by a Beechbrae Scottish Longhair
Exotic. The kittens are really valuable to us since we've been
able to access completely new Chinchilla lines to those available in
Australia.
..
Colleen Walters
Kurranulla Cattery - PKD tested negative
<http://walters.idx.com.au>http://walters.idx.com.au
<http://silvertails.idx.com.au>http://silvertails.idx.com.au
ed note: It is our understanding that an
"Exotic" is a shorthair Chinchilla i.e. same breed lines, and
that the longhair version is fundamentally identical to the Chinchilla
by way of breed pool genetics. The Exotic question (of allowable out
cross) did come up in our early discussions with CCA. We did not go
with it. That decision was not
so much to exclude but rather to remain less complicated. The ultimate
test with these "variants" would be who's version is acceptable to
whom(association to association).
Update April 2007
The Asian application
In 2005 Ms. Ghorbrial, Bess cattery, contacted us
(Horizons) with a view to supporting an application to CFA for
recognition of the 'Asian' cat that she proposed to undertake. During
those discussions, initiated and mediated by Pat Swihart of Charm
Cattery, it was agreed that no cat would be taken forward with a birth
date after Jan 2000 that had other than European Burmese or Chinchilla
Persian in its ancestry. Bess developed the application and made
submission to CFA. Horizon supported the application and initiated
construction of a web site.
Much of the application material was incorporated into the web site.
Both Bess and Horizons are European Burmese breeders
and at this time are members of the European Burmese Breed council
(Horizon was not a Breed council member in early 2006). Horizons is and
was a member of the European Burmese breed club, Bess is and was a
member of the WEBS (Worldwide European Burmese Society). Both of these
breed club's presidents Wayne Trevithan and Ann-Louise De Voe
respectively took a position in opposition to this application. The
clubs followed suit. Ann Louise DweVoe was Breed Council secretary in
2006.
Given the precarious nature of the application and
applicats at the time, and the rising tide of opposition, is was
mutually decided to withdraw the Asian application to CFA. That
application was withdrawn by telephone call to the CFA office and the
application along with the considerable deposite was returned to, and
received by Bess cattery on or about Jan 16 2006.
We would note that Applications for New Breed Status
required a presentation before the CFA Breeds and Standard Board in Feb
of 2006 in Texas. Most of the Asian Breeders are in the nothern United
States and Canada. Any such show requires considerable planning and
expense. For more
see CFA web site
The following was taken from the Board minutes
of Feb 2006 and are from that meeting as provided to us by the
breed council. The rational statement is from the Breed council and we
understand to be the position as put forward by Mr. Trevithan at the
time.
3.
Do you feel the acceptance of the Asian Cat for CFA registration status
would have an effect on the European Burmese breed?
RATIONALE: The Asian standard is
basically word for word identical to the European Burmese standard. The
Asian breed mimics the European Burmese breed in genotype and
phenotype. Referring to WIAB, which is in effect with CFA, the Asian
breed is out of order.
YES:
11
NO: 8
BOARD ACTION: Informational only.
We were surprised to see this and emailed the Breed council the
following:
Dear
David and fellow Breed Council members:
I am writing in reference
to concerns with the board meeting minutes attached to David's
email. The paragraph in question is copied below and reads:
(see copy above)
The concerns are threefold
as follows:
1) Is is our understanding that
as party to this action of the Asian, the Asian Application was
withdrawn in the summer of 2005 (approximately 6 months
prior to the 2006 board meeting). Therefore, any discussion of a
"Standard" was, in and of itself "Out of Order". We do not
understand how this piece of information could have escaped the chair
of this meeting.
2)"Identical" , "Mimics" and
"WIAB"
Below are some "Asians".
They are neither identical nor mimic the European Burmese
phenotypically or genotypically.


WIAB
A search of CFA's web site
contains one obscure reference to this term. Therefore, how can WIAB be
"in effect". Breeds are defined by their standard, as much
as some would have it otherwise. Some European Burmese breeders
may, for their own personal reasons, object to the application of
the Asian/Burmilla,(various associations have different names), but the
Breed Council must be extremely careful as to how they allow that
to be done. Whatever the criteria used to differentiate the European
Burmese from the Burmese, that same criteria can apply to the
differentiation of the Asian/Burmilla from the European Burmese. To use
the WIAB argument in this situation is a two edged sword that may
well do more harm than good especially when seen in the light of the
present disputes concerning the current movement of the Judging
process towards the traditional cobby North American Burmese type.
There are many in the cat world who believe "a Burmese is a
Burmese".
Further, granted there is much in the Burmilla/Asian that does mimic
the Burmese. That is and always was, intentional. It
is not the same however. The program is considerably more
but no less than the program that originally introduced the red gene to
the European Burmese that you all prize so highly. The only
difference is that it was separated out under another breed name in
order that there be order, not confusion as has occurred in New
Zealand.
3)The Asian Breed is out of order.
This is ridiculous. It is
the kind of comment one would expect to find pointed out and
highlighted in the humour section on the NY times.A Cat or a breed can not be out of
Order. I know we love our cats but they do not have standing at
meetings.
Solutions and Request:
It is my opinion that CFA has
engaged in inappropriate process (a "faux pas") --- "Punchy"
notwithstanding. This comment has great potential embarrassment for CFA
and the European Breed Council in the future. This paragraph should be
stricken from the record.
I respectfully request that
David, on behalf of the breed council:
1. Approach the CFA chair
and ask that the above noted paragraph be removed.
2. Report back to Council,
the results.
If this is not accomplished, then
I would like David to take forward the motion:
"That the minutes of the Board
Meeting of 2006 which contained the Asian discussion be amended to
strike the above mentioned paragraph".
Best Regards,
Ivan
There was no response from the new breed secretary Mr. Davis Osage, to
this or requests for information, other than to schedule the
breed council meeting June 30, (and call for adgenda items) which would
we assume to be part of the CFA Annual meeting and show (in Texas?? ).
There were 3 emails posted to the breed council chat group in
response. We note the correct order of business, after a motion
is made, is for the chair to accept the motion.
Two from Ann Louise seeking clarification and the following:
Dear
Breed Council Members:
I will attempt to address the issues raised on this list regarding the
2006 Breed Council ballot. Although I am a breed council member
as well, I will recuse myself in that capacity to put on my CFA
Secretary hat and respond factually from that perspective, and try not
to participate in a debate. I am a new Breed Council member and
have only a few grands. I have seen only three Asians exhibited
last July so I don't know enough about the breed to have formed an
opinion.
Before addressing the issues, let’s discuss what a CFA Breed Council
(“BC”) is and what the role of a Breed Council Secretary (“BCS”) is, so
that we are all on the same page. The BC Standing Rules state
that the councils shall “serve the Executive Board in an advisory
capacity.” The BCS represents the members as best he/she can, or
risks not being re-elected. I can say from a board-member
perspective that Wayne, Pat, Ann-Louise and now David have all been
fierce proponents of the breed on behalf of the BC members.
Nowhere does it state that a BC member can demand certain things of the
BCS or the Executive Board. However, the Standing Rules direct
that, “In no case will the Executive Board accept a new breed without
providing the Breed Council Secretaries of any breed which has been
used to establish a proposed new breed an opportunity to
comment.” In this respect, the mention of the Asian breed in the
2006 European Burmese ballot was by Executive Board mandate, and the
then-serving BCS was correct in her actions. If you have any
questions regarding the differences between the CFA breed councils and
BC’s of other associations, I refer you to Annette Wilson, the Breeds
& Standards Chair (arwilson@prodigy.net).
The threefold concerns were as follows:
1. Concern about the discussion of an Asian “standard”. The
Asian application would have included a standard provided by the
promoters of the Asian breed, themselves. Deadlines for
submission and withdrawal of Breeds & Standards matters are
firm. The concerned party’s “understanding” (rather than personal
knowledge?) of the withdrawal of the Asian application is “the summer
of 2005”, which may have been beyond the deadline for withdrawal.
Granted, I do not know who the Breed Committee Chair for the Asian is,
as that individual has never corresponded with me in my capacity as CFA
Secretary (although I have many emails from that time period from
individuals who opposed the breed). Bottom line is, the purported
standard was submitted and withdrawn. A failure to understand how
“this piece of information could have escaped the chair of the meeting”
may come from the fact that the Asian Breed Committee Chair also failed
to contact the chair of the meeting – Pam DelaBar, CFA President -or
the Breeds and Standards Chair by the withdrawal deadline.
2. WIAB: The policy is in effect, although the “obscure
reference” is due to the fact that WIAB is an unofficial nickname and
is used quite often as a term of art. Please see
http://cfa.org/breeds/breed-definition.html for “Definition of a
Breed”. As far as the European Burmese being threatened to be
“very careful”, the fact remains that the breed is already established
in Championship in CFA and the Asian is not, so this warning seems to
be a little backwards. Further, as far as the allegations that
“the current movement of the judging process towards the traditional
cobby North American Burmese type”, this is simply offensive and not
worthy of time to defend it (or the anonymous internet website
professing this same philosophy, practically word for word).
3. The Asian Breed is out of order. I apologize for my lack
of ability to understand where this concern originates. However,
since it was brought up, the application for registration of a breed
that violates the Definition of a Breed can, in fact, be ruled out of
order.
Responses to Solutions and Request:
CFA has engaged in inappropriate process – “Punchy”
notwithstanding. I admit that the word “punchy” originally came
from me when I forwarded the 2007 transcript to BCS Osage. I
apologize if anyone found it as offensive as it is now becoming.
The concern about the so-called “inappropriate process” arises from the
2006 meeting. I did not intend for the 2007 term to be used as a
means for the 2006 meeting to be criticized. If the established
“process” which has allegedly been inappropriately engaged in could be
pointed out, perhaps I could better respond. However, I support
the CFA Executive Board’s actions at that meeting as being
appropriate. The Board is very conscientious about following
proper procedure. Anyone may attend the open session portions of
any board meeting to make a first-hand judgment for themselves.
Until they do, maybe it is best not to reserve comment about how the
twice-elected CFA President conducts meetings.
I respectfully request that
David, on behalf of the breed council … If this is not accomplished,
then I would like David to take forward the motion “That the minutes of
the Board Meeting of 2006 which contained the Asian discussion be
amended to strike the above mentioned paragraph. A BCS has
the option (or not) of polling his/her breed council and coming to the
board with a request on behalf of the entire BC, should he so
choose. An individual is also welcome to present a request on
his/her own behalf. Because the action requested involves the CFA
minutes, a request would be made to the CFA Secretary for a “correction
to the minutes”. The individual with the responsibility and
control of the minutes is the CFA Secretary (currently, me), although
the Executive Board has power to veto/over-rule my decisions and
challenge any portion of the minutes. In this case, I am not
inclined to change the breed council proposal as published well over a
year ago, for the reasons that: (1) it was appropriate for the former
BCS to include it and, in fact, she was required to do so; (2) the
proposed ballot was sent to the then-current BC members for approval
prior to submission, and no objections were raised at that time; (3) BC
members had a further opportunity to object when the ballot was mailed,
at the board meeting, or within a reasonable time of publishing of the
minutes; and (4) in my three terms as CFA Secretary, I have never
changed a breed council ballot that has been voted on by the BC members
and reviewed by the CFA Board of Directors.
It is my hope that the concerns have been addressed and that everyone
has my best answers to their questions.
Rachel Anger, Secretary
The Cat Fanciers' Association, Inc.
Ms Anger is also a CFA Judge
What the reader needs to understand is what the Asian issues with CFA
are.
The motion before the board was out of order because the application
was withdrawn - the application was returned to the applicant
before the meeting.
CFA sets out a process for new Breed application on their page Rules
Governing Acceptance and Advancement of New Breeds and Colors.
and expands that process on page
Recognition for Status as a Provisional Breed Requirements
where it says
It
is highly desirable that examples of the breed or new color be
presented to the CFA Executive Board at one of the regular meetings. It
is essential that a breeder, thoroughly knowledgeable in the history of
the new breed or color and absolutely familiar with every aspect of the
breed or color present the cats and information to the Board.
The process then in simple terms, as we understand it, is that
you collect your information and forward it to the Executive Board,
then at the appointed time you go before that board and present your
case. The Board also takes information from those opposed to the
application as is outlined above and makes a (fair, just, and
equitable) decision.
The fundamental point is that the board made a decision on no
(withdrawn) information and no presentation. In other words the
case was tried in absentia with only one view at the table. It sets a
precedent of pre judgment, and an process, if allowed to stand,
to for stall any new breed application by an opposing party.
We can not think that this would be CFA's true intention.
The motion contained serious misinformation. and inappropriate language.
"The Asian standard is basically
word for word identical to the European Burmese standard. The Asian
breed mimics the European Burmese breed in genotype and phenotype."
That is to say that an Asian
can not be easily differentiated from a European Burmese.
This is what breed council says and this is not the case.
. see standard proposed......and
see also 10 years of "Asian Breeding".
WIAB "term of art" refers to this CFA Page "Definition of
Breed" wherein it says
The
establishment of classes in any breed which:
(a) in the case of a hybrid or currently outcrossing breed, mimic* the
parent breed(s); or,
(b) in the case of a new breed, mimic*, an existing breed, will not be
permitted. AOV classes are not affected by this stipulation.
Definition of mimic:
A class of cats would be said to mimic either (a) the parent breed, or
(b) an already existing breed, when such a class of cats so closely
resemble (a) the parent breed, or (b) already existing breed, that the
defining features of the two groups are considered to be basically the
same and the differences between the two groups cannot be said to be
definite.
It is absolutely
clear to all cat breeders and the public that there are great
differences between the Asian cats illustrated
and a European Burmese.
A a European Burmese is a man made breed originating from a Burmese and
a Red Siamese in order to hold the red gene. The European Burmese is
differentiated by that one red gene.
An Asian is man made breed originating from a European Burmese
and Chinchilla Persian in order to hold the Agouti, Full
expression, Long hair, Silver, Spotted, Wide band and Superwide band
genes. There are many genes that diferentiate the Asian from the
European Burmese.
The Burmese comes from Siamese , the Chinchilla has no alliance with
the Burmese.
The European Burmese shows the colours/patterns of the Burmese.
The Asian does not show the colours/patterns of the European Burmese.
If CFA grants separation of the European Burmese from the Burmese
under "Definition of breed"as they did, then that sets a
standard. We believe CFA must
grant separation of the Asian from the E Burmese based on the same
standard. That is a logic
statement.
If the reader is interested in the genetics that arrises out of
this breeding progrem please go to the genetics1
page